27 Commissionfs quality criteria For law reform reports and advisory work Purpose . The purpose of projects and policy advice will be clearly identified and focused on remedying the mischief to which it is addressed. Logic . All argument will be logical and supported by facts, and explain any assumptions made. Accurate research . Recommendations and advice will be supported by research that is thorough, accurate and takes account of all relevant material. Practicality . All recommendations and advice will consider questions of practicality, especially issues of implementation, cost, technical feasibility, timing and consistency with other Commission reports and advice. Consultation . Advice and recommendations will be the result of appropriate consultation with interested parties, and all reasonable objections will be identified. All submissions will be carefully considered before advice is finalised. Peer review . Where appropriate and practical external experts will review reports and advice. Internal review . Analysis and advice will be subjected to rigorous and critical review by the Commission. Presentation . Reports and advice will be written in as clear a manner as the technical nature of the subject matter allows Periodically the Commission will seek an independent, external evaluation of a selection of our reports against these quality For legislation quality and design advice Internal peer review and policy approval by President and one other member of the Commission where practicable. Agreed timeframes Reports and reviews will be produced within the timeframes specified in the Commissionfs annual work programme, as agreed with the Responsible Minister and Cabinet at the start of the period. If changes to timeframes prove necessary during the year, these are discussed and agreed with the Minister, usually as part of the four monthly performance reporting process.