22
Proposals ranged from the correction of a minor defect in a statute to the re-
drafting of a whole area of the law.9
85. The LR Committee frequently co-opted lawyers and law lecturers in the
preparation of reports or to comment on proposals. All work was done on a
voluntary unpaid basis, although members of the LR Committee were
reimbursed travelling expenses. The LR Committee functioned from 1936-1966
except during the Second World War when it went into recess.
86. The LR Committee had very little time to consider proposals given the
infrequency of meetings, and the fact that Committee members were also
practising members of the profession acting in a volunteer capacity. This affected
the process by which proposals were considered. Reform proposals were
generally considered on their merits first, and if necessary further considered in
detail by a sub-committee (usually including non-members). The sub-committee
was then required to report to the LR Committee at a subsequent meeting. The
LR Committee was also able to ask for a report from the Department of Justice
or some other body.
87. It was a common practice of the LR Committee, if it approved a proposal in
principle, to request that a draft Bill be prepared (by Parliamentary Counsel)
containing the details of the scheme. The draft Bill was then considered, and
recommended for legislative action if approved.
88. The LR Committee was also able to receive submissions from organisations and
individuals on reform proposals.
89. Between 1937-1965 the LR Committee considered around 250 suggestions for
reform. About 160 of these were the subject of recommendations for legislative
change. According to Hanan the great majority of these recommendations
resulted in legislation.10
90. The LR Committee was responsible for many important reforms: the Law
Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1944 and 1949, the Trustee Act 1956, the
9
J R Hanan, above n4, 10.
10
J R Hanan, above n4, 7.