9 Options include:    (a)   Continuing  to  respond  to  Law  Commission  Reports  as  they  are  produced, with  more  attention  to  communicating  Government’s  priorities  regarding their work programme.    (b)   Making a conscious decision to allocate more policy resource and legislative drafting resource to implement Law Commission recommendations per se.    (c)   Reviewing the function of the Law Commission as a vehicle for law reform.    21.    The Government has decided to evaluate the Law Commission’s work and this Report is the result of that decision.    22.    The  Report  is  divided  into  four  Parts.    Part  One  contains  the  summary  and recommendations.  Part Two examines the history of New Zealand law reform machinery prior to 1986 when the Law Commission was established.      23.    Part  Three  outlines  the  current  trends  in  law  reform  machinery  in  the  United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. 24.    Part  Four  is  the  heart  of  the  Report.  It  looks  specifically  at  the  New  Zealand Law   Commission   and   discusses   the   statutory   framework   for   the   Law Commission;  the  implementation  of  Commission  Reports;  the  relationship between   the   Law   Commission   and   the   Ministry   of   Justice;   the   Law Commission’s   relationship   wth   other   bodies;   timeliness   of   Reports;   Law Commisssioners and Commission staff;  the Maori dimension in law reform; the provision of policy advice in Government; and, use of Government resources by the Law Commission.