1. Repeal the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. 2.   Reduce the number of Judges. 3.   Abolish the Supreme Court. 4.   Abolish the position of Judges’ Clerk. 5.   Train career Judges. 23 It is not an exaggeration to characterise this as a radical agenda. On the internal evidence of the article it is fair to claim that Professor Smillie has little confidence that his agenda will be adopted.  He offers this explanation:  “Even though I have spent  most  of  my  life  in  the  deep  south  of  New  Zealand  I  realise  that  my recommendations   for   change   are   not   likely   to   find   a   sympathetic   ear   in Wellington”.²⁰  So he offers an alternative prescription should his Plan A not be adopted.    His  alternative  is  to  extend  the  Bill  of  Rights  to  cover  social  and political rights because, he argues, the social justice element has been neglected in Bill  of  Rights  jurisprudence.    Advocates  of  Bills  of  Rights  will  want,  he  says, judges to be charged with making really important decisions that impact directly on the lives of people.    24 While I do not have time to deal in full with the argument he runs, it seems to me that its fundamental flaw stems from the fact that in advocating a Bill of Rights that includes judicial review of legislative action it is important to recognize the limitations  on  the  judicial  method.    To  say  the  Courts  are  good  at  some  things does  not  imply  a  judgment  that  they  are  good  at  everything.  The  limits  of justiciability need to be firmly kept in mind.   25 So  Professor  Smillie  offers  the  second  policy  option,  at  the  other  end  of  the spectrum  to  his  first,  which  is  to  adopt  a  Bill  of  Rights  as  superior  law  that includes not only civil and political rights but also social and economic rights. The prime   model   for   that   approach   flows   from   the   modern   South   African Constitution.²¹    South  Africa  has  a  constitutional  court.  That  Court  played  an important role in the formation of the new constitution. It had to approve the draft                                                  20   Smillie above n 19, 193.   21   Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, as adopted by the Constitutional Assembly on 8 May 1996. 9