10 fundamentally  excluding  attitudes  and  approaches  are  being  challenged  and  sensible alternatives are being offered to them. Last  year  we  were  involved  in  a  short  project  on  covert  filming⁴⁰  as  an  immediate response to a lacuna in  our law with regard to those who use new technology to invade the  personal  space  of  New  Zealanders  by  filming  up  skirts  or  in  changing  rooms  or toilets.    At the other end of the spectrum we took almost 3 years to undertake a comprehensive review of New Zealand Courts and Tribunals⁴¹.  This was an opportunity to step outside the  immediate  confines  of  the  existing  structures  and  see  whether  there  were  new  and better ways of doing things which would maintain the integrity of process but advance accessibility to the law. Our  Law  Commission,  like  many,  has  undertaken  serious  reviews  of  areas  of  both substantive   and   procedural   law.      The   review   of   evidence   law⁴²   was   a   mammoth undertaking.  A review of the Property Law Act⁴³ similarly is typical of what goes on around the world. There   are   a   myriad   of   areas   which   will   be   studied,   assessed   and   which   will   be candidates  for  reform.    The  wider  and  more  diverse  the  input,  the  better  will  be  the outcome.                                                  40   Law Commission Intimate Covert Filming NZLC SP15 (Wellington, 2004) 41   Law Commission  Striking the Balance NZLC PP51 (Wellington, 2002);  Seeking Solutions: Options for  Change  to  the  New  Zealand  Court  System:  Have  your  Say:  Part  2  NZLC  PP52  (Wellington, 2002);  Delivering Justice for All NZLC R85 (Wellington, 2004). 42   Law Commission Evidence NZLC R55 (Wellington, 1999) 43   Law Commission A New Property Law Act NZLC R29 (Wellington, 1994)