15
responded to in other places, the academic writing on the subject and the community
responses to it are all valuable and important to record.
Sir Geoffrey Palmer (the father of our Law Commission) was asked at the beginning
of 2000 to review the operation of the New Zealand Law Commission48. Not
unsurprisingly he was sympathetic to our activities and continuation, but one of the
important outcomes was that the Government has now committed itself to responding to
Law Commission reports within six months.
The responses to date have been patchy. For example, a large part of our work for the
last 3 years was concerned with a review of the entire Courts system. Some
recommendations were threatening and challenging, particularly to some Judges and the
legal profession. Because the Government is currently involved in a Baseline Review
of the Ministry of Justice,49 it was able to finesse much of the report by indicating that
the outcome of the Baseline Review would have to occur first50. Although we see that
as unsatisfactory, because our report deals with mission and vision while the Baseline
Review is more focussed at an operational level, the response requirement was
important.
Government has a responsibility, not least because the Parliament has funded our
operation, to assess what we are doing and indicate whether they accept or reject the
recommendations for reform that are made.
48
Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Evaluation of the Law Commission : Report for the Associate Minister of
Justice and Attorney-General Hon. Margaret Wilson (Chen & Palmer, Wellington, 2000)
49
A stock take of the Ministry including its strengths and weaknesses and the resource implications for
the future.
50
Ministry of Justice Government Response to the Law Commission Report on Delivering Justice for
All < http://www.justice.govt.nz > (last accessed 28 January 2005)