16
Commission held face to face consultations, except with rural indigenous groups,
where tele-conferencing was used.
3.2.3 Public Submissions
The most useful submissions generally contain critical analysis of the law or provide
evidence of the practical operation of the law that would otherwise be difficult or
impossible to obtain. The preparation of submissions of this calibre involves
significant effort and resources on the part of those making them. All Commissions
face the constant dilemma of how to elicit submissions from persons and
organisations who have a genuine interest in a reference and the best of intentions
about providing their input, but who ultimately may not be able to find the time to
contribute their views. There are no easy answers as to how participation in the law
reform process can be made more accessible. On a practical level, the QLRC is
always willing to take oral submissions, which can, to a certain extent, reduce the
work that would otherwise be involved for a respondent in preparing a written
submission.
Occasionally, submissions may be skewed by organisations and interest groups who
exhort their members to send pro-forma submissions. The Tasmania Law Reform
Institute, in its recent report on Adoption by Same Sex couples, received a total of
1300 submissions: only 195 of which were not duplicates.29 Such an issue will
probably have polarised community views, have been well publicised in the media
and with interest groups with strong opinions at either end of the debate. Of course,
the original submission is considered but its duplicate goes only to assessing the
weight of community opinion behind a particular position; it adds very little else.
3.3 Use of Media
The media is an important tool for informing the general public about what references
the QLRC is undertaking, as well as communicating the progress of those references
29
Tasmania
Law
Reform
Institute
Media
Release
(29
May
2003),
at
http://www.law.utas.edu.au/reform/MediaReleaseAdoptionFinRep.pdf, visited 18/03/2004.