21 The web site is still at the trial stage.  It will be interesting to see not only the quantity but   also   the   quality   of   responses   generated.      The   QLRC   is   unaware   of   any submissions to it on its current reference having been generated by this website but it is  perhaps  just  a  matter  of  time  before  eConsultation  becomes  if  not  the  norm,  a standard method of seeking views and submissions from members of the public. 4. Conclusion – eLaw Reform? According to Franz Kafka, Roscoe Pound and Charles Dickens, the law is something to which people want access, but to which they are denied or sense they are denied.  It must be the concern of providers of law and of policy makers to ensure that all who want  and  need  access  to  the  law  and  to  law  reform  are  provided  it,  within  the limitations  of  the  system.    The  Queensland  experience  shows  that  seeking  relevant public  involvement  in  the  law  reform  process  has  led  to  the  production  of  better reports, more useful to parliament and to the general public, and sent to the legislature with stronger community awareness and  support.  Law Reform Commissions must, however, keep themselves and their processes under the same kind of rigorous review that  we  apply  to  our  references.    We  must  be  prepared  to  introduce  the  innovative solutions to our consultation practices that we apply to other areas of law reform: we are  living  at  a  time  in  which  radical  new  means  of  communication  are  being introduced in all areas of public life, and we must remain open to any initiatives that can improve access to justice and the process of law reform. May I suggest that this as a topic for discussion in this session of the conference.