32 toward more consensual dispute resolution was the publication of Roger Fisher and William Ury’s book , Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (New York: Penguin Books, 1983), which has become a classic text. 13 The growth of international trade has led to the search for improved methods of resolving disputes that cross political boundaries. Technology has been a major force not only in the globalization of trade but also in the development of on-line dispute resolution sites and methods. 14 ALRI CM 12.6, at 53. 15 The Honourable Hugh F. Landerkin, Q.C. and Andrew J. Pirie, “Judges  as Mediators: What’s the Problem with Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada?” (2003) 82  Can. Bar Rev. 259 , at 255, citing E. Lind & T. Tyleer, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Press, 1988) and N. Welsh, “Makin g Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got To Do With It?” (2001), 79 Wash.  U.L.Q. 787. 16 Landerkin & Pirie, at 257. 17 CM 12.6, at  ... 18 Landerkin & Pirie, at 257, quoting A. Pirie, Alternative ... etc. 19 Jacob, at 4: “A second re ason [for the growth of ADR] is a financially driven recognition that it is not the business of the State to be involved in private quarrels.” 20 The 1989 Canadian Bar Association Task Force on Alternative Dispute Resolution urged lawyers to see ADR “as a strong  expression of the legal profession’s continuing  commitment to fair and effective dispute resolution”: La nderkin & Pirie, at 274-275, citing Supra note 49 at 4. 21 This “multi-op tion” vision was first  proposed by Professor Frank Sander of Harvard in a paper presented at the 1976 Pound Conference: Landerkin & Pirie, at 273. 22 E.g., 23 Landerkin & Pirie, at 274, citing Canadian Bar Association Task Force on Systems of Civil Justice, Report of the Task Force on Systems of Civil Justice (Ottawa: Canadian Bar Association, 1996) at 18. 24 Ibid. at 23. 25 CBA Task Force Report on Civil Justice ..., ibid. at 33. Recommendation 1. 26 Ibid., at 63. 27 Ibid. 28