⁵¹Section 17C(2) of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989.      ⁵²Clarity No 44, p 40.      ⁵³See, for examp le, the Property (Relationships) Act 1976, Personal Property Securities Act 1999, Animal Pro ducts   Act   1999 ,   New    Zealand   P ublic   H ealth   and   D isability   Act   2000,   and   Health   Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003. 34 as to be consistent with current legislative drafting practice. The need for these changes is obvious. A statute reprinted in the pre-2000 format and reflecting earlier drafting practices with post-2000 amendments in the current format and reflecting current drafting practices would be a strange beast. The enlarged reprint powers are subject to the overriding qualification that no change may be made that, if enacted, would change the effect of the legislation.⁵¹ 62 At about the same time, the format of United Kingdom statutes also underwent substantial   modification.   The   typeface   is   now   Book   Antiqua,   described   as   a compromise between the House of Lords (which recommended Times New Roman) and the House of Commons (which recommended Palatino).⁵² 63 The passage of the Interpretation Act 1999 was achieved as a result of the PCO, the Law Commission, and the Ministry of Justice working in close collaboration over a period of about 3 years. The changes to the format of legislation also took about 3 years to implement. Each depended on strong parliamentary support. 64 Numerous  other  changes  have  been  made  to  the  expression  of  New  Zealand legislation over recent years. They include— • the  use  of  outline  sections  or  Parts  that  provide  an  overview  of  what  a particular Act is about⁵³ • the  use  of  examples  both  in  the  text  of  the  legislation  and  in  separate