⁶⁵[2003] 1 All ER 385.      ⁶⁶[2003] 1 All ER 689.      ⁶⁷[2003] 1 All ER 731. 47 94 Volume 1 of the All England Law Reports for 2003 contain reports of cases decided in the High Court, Court of Appeal, House of Lords, and Privy Council. Multiple judgments  were  given  in  the  following  3  cases  reported  in  the  volume.  In  R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment⁶⁵ the Court of Appeal had to consider whether parents’ religious belief  that physical “correction” was appropriate was interfered with by a provision of the Education Act 1996 that prevented teachers imposing corporal punishment and was contrary to Article 9 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. By a majority, the court held that the section did not inhibit the carrying out of those beliefs. Each Judge delivered a separate judgment. The report of the decision extends to 80 pages. Mathews v Ministry of Defence⁶⁶ is a decision of the House of Lords in which the question was whether a statutory limitation on actions in tort was incompatible with Article 6 of the Convention. Each of the 5 Law Lords gave   separate   judgments,   each   holding   that   because   the   limitation   was   not procedural  there  was  no  incompatibility.  The  report  is  40  pages  long.  The  case reported  immediately  after  Mathews  is  Runa  Begum  v  Tower  Hamlets  London Borough  Council,⁶⁷  in  which  the  House  of  Lords  had  to  consider  whether  a procedure for dealing with disputed claims for housing relief was incompatible with Article 6. Again, 5 separate judgments were delivered, each deciding that there was no incompatibility. The report is about 30 pages long. 95 Of the 62 cases reported in the volume, 46 were decisions of courts comprising more  than  one  judge  and  in  26  of  those  cases  more  than  one  judgment  was