⁹⁴NZLC R 14.      ⁹⁵NZLC R 29.      ⁹⁶NZLC R 38.      ⁹⁷NZLC  R 39 (although implemented in part b y  the Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001, Family Proceedings Amendm ent Act 2001, and the Administration Amendment Act 2001 ).      ⁹⁸NZLC R 41.      ⁹⁹NZLC R 31. 65 133 As against this, there are a number of significant Commission reports that have not, or not yet, borne fruit. They include Criminal Procedure: Part One: Disclosure and Committal (1990)⁹⁴ A New Property Law Act (1994)⁹⁵, 3 reports on succession law Succession   Law:   Homicidal   Heirs   (1997)⁹⁶,   Succession   Law:   A   Succession (Adjustment) Act (1997)⁹⁷, and Succession Law: A Succession (Wills) Act (1997)⁹⁸, Police Questioning (1994) ⁹⁹, and a 2-volume report on reform of evidence law Evidence: Reform of the Law and Evidence: Code and Commentary (1999). 134 The Commission’ s proposals for new legislation on property law and wills stand out as examples of excellent substantive modernisation initiatives, but they must have government and parliamentary support if they are to materialise. A related  problem, but by no means an insignificant one, is that the longer it takes to implement law reform proposals, the more difficult it becomes to do so. A momentum builds up and with it the enthusiasm and determination that are essential to driving legislative change. That has to be capitalised on, not left to evaporate. The Law Commission’s recommendation  for  new  interpretation  legislation  was  implemented  almost  a decade after the Commission’s report. 135 The key players in the Commission, Sir Kenneth Keith and the able researchers, had moved on. The task of implementation fell to Professor Richard Sutton as acting President and then to Sir Kenneth’s successor, Justice David Barag wanath, and a